Showing posts with label Social. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Social. Show all posts

Monday, April 21, 2025

The role of the governor , the President and The Supreme court of India

 

                                                                   Image Source

What is the news? Recently,  on 8th April 2025 , honourable Supreme court of India gave a landmark decision about the withholding of the bills passed by the state legislature . The court also mentioned some time limits regarding the holding of bill.

The matter and the role of nominated representative : Generally it is seen that when the Governors and the state governments belong to same political party  then the administration as well as the functioning of the government runs in a proper and smooth manner . But when both of them are from different political parties there is always a clash of thoughts . Similar matter was seen between the Governor of Tamil Nadu and its state government headed by MK Stalin . The Stalin government has passed about 10 bills and sent to the Governor Shri T N RAVI . But the Governor had held the bill till December 2023. When the Stalin government moved to the Supreme court on 18th December 2023, on the same day The Governor sent all the bills to the President.  Out of 10 bills, 7 bills were cancelled by  her and 1 bill was given permission, and two bills were not considered by The President.

This matter was very deeply discussed for more than 2 years in front of various benches of the Supreme Court. On 8th April 2025 , the two-judge bench of the Supreme Court, represented by Justice J B Pardiwala and R Mahadevan, gave a landmark decision. I will discuss the designs by the Supreme court, but before the decisions, let’s know about some articles and role of the Governor according to various intellectuals. 

Article 163 discusses about the power of the governor

Article 200 says that “ When a bill has been passed by state  assembly or in case of legislative council has been passed by both the houses , it shall be presented to the Governor and the Governor shall declare either that he assents to  the bill  or that he withholds  the assent therefrom or that he reserves the bill for the consideration of the President .

Some thoughts about the role of governors …….

As discussed earlier , the governor always acts as a bone of contention for the government which belongs to the opposite political thoughts . Our intellectuals have given very important thoughts regarding the governor which is mentioned below ……

1.        Shri Jawahar Lal Nehru ji  favoured the appointment of eminent academicians from outside politics and Other outstanding and impartial people from other walks of life as governors .

2.        B N RAU ( constitutional advisor to the constituent assembly )  favoured that Governor to be elected by provincial legislature by secret vote.

3.        Sardar Vallabh Bhai Patel  said that the Governor should be elected by the people of the state for a term of four years and could be impeached for misbehaviour.

4.        J P Narayan  suggested that Governor to be made by the President from a panel of four persons selected by assembly and member of parliaments of the concerned state.

5.        Ambedkar  said that Governor is just a figure head . We should not spend time and money for his election . Governor would not represent ruling party at the centre but people of state .

6.        T T Krishnamachari suggested that Chief minister must have veto power above the Governor.

7.        Supreme court in the Raghukul tilak case of 1979  said that Governors are not the employee of centre but hold high constitutional office .

8.        Miguel de Cervantes suggested that The Good Governors must have broken leg and keep at home .

9.        Many other intellectuals also suggested that Governor having a faint presence like a full moon on midday . Governor must be present for consulting the government , warning the government and also to encourage the state.

Elected representative must have more powers than the nominated one .

As per 7th schedule of the Constitution,  states should be free to legislate on 66 subjects under state list .

In the famous case of State of Punjab vs principal secretary to the Governor of Punjab 2013 , Supreme court suggested that Real power vests with elected representatives of people in a parliamentary form of Government.  The Governor as an appointee is a titular ahead of the state .

About discretion

Discretion has the meaning of acting on one’s own authority and judgment. In law, discretion as to legal rulings, such as whether evidence is excluded at a trial, may be exercised by a judge.

Some thoughts regarding the discretion……

10.                    According to  Edward coke …. Discretion is a science – discerning between falsity  and truth , between right and wrong , is not According to the will and private affection . Absolute Discretion is however is a blassphemy.

11.                    According to Justice William  Doughlas of Supreme court of United states ( United states vs Wunderlich – 1951) …….. where discretion is absolute , man has always suffered.  Absolute discretion is ruthless master (which is) more destructive of freedom than any of man’s other inventions .

12.                    Discretion means choosing from amongst various available alternatives with reference to the rules of reason and justice not personal whims.

13.                    Discretion is to exercised with caution and in a reasonable manner.

14.                    Discretion cannot be dictated . It is to be exercised after a proper application of mind to the facts and circumstances of the case at hand .

15.                    Discretion cannot be exercised for improper purpose or with a bad faith or by taking into account irrelevant consideration.

16.                    Discretion cannot be exercised in an arbitrary or whimsical manner.

Why are we discussing more about discretion…..

Article 142 empowers the Supreme Court to pass any order or decree necessary for complete justice in any pending case before it. This power is discretionary and unique to the apex court.

Using this such an important article , Supreme court gave the landmark decision which is discussed below ……

17.                    Honourable Supreme court  gave a statement and said that prolonged action over 10 important bills by Tamil Nadu governor is UNCONSTITUTIONAL.

18.                    The decision about the bills by the President was declared as void by the Apex court .

19.                    Justice Pardiwala also said that a governor must be a friend , guide and a philosopher to a State not as a hindrance.  The Governor is envisaged aa a sagacious counsellor . The court also said that the Governor must look within themselves and reflect whether their actions were in line with the Constitutional ethos and aspirations of the people . Delaying assent indefinitely on bills passed by state legislature reduced the effectiveness of these laws.

20.                    The Governor’s conduct was erroneous , arbitrary , non- est(non existant) in law.

21.                    The Governor acted as a roadblock by delaying actions on the bills sent him for consent by assembly under article 200 of the Constitution.

22.                    The Governor has no right to use pocket veto and delaying the bill.

The Supreme court has given a time limit but in our Constitution no such a time limit is mentioned . The Supreme court in very harsh  language  said that….

1.                  A Governor has maximum of one month to withhold the assent on the aid and advice of the State Cabinet.

2.                  If he withholds assent contrary to the cabinets advice , he has maximum of three months to return the bill with specifying the reasons .

3.                  The governor has three months to reserve a bill for President’s consideration against advice of the state cabinet .

4.                  Governor must grant assent to a bill repassed by the cabinet within a month under article 200.

5.                  A Governor cannot exercise his personal discretion if a house passed the same bill again and returned it to him for consent.

6.                  Any failure by the Governor to comply with the timeliness would invite for a JUDICIAL REVIEW.

The Stalin government has welcomed the decision while the NDA government is going towards Supreme court  to review it’s decision….



Team Yuva Aaveg-

Shashwat

🌟 Join Yuva Aaveg! 🌟
A vibrant community dedicated to empowering youth with the latest insights, discussions, and updates on topics that matter. Connect with like-minded individuals, share ideas, and stay inspired to make a difference.

📲 Join us on WhatsApp and Telegram for exclusive updates and engaging conversations!


WhatsApp


 Telegram

Thursday, April 10, 2025

WAQF : HISTORY , AMMENDMENTS AND ITS CONTROVERSIES IN BHARAT

 

                                Image Source


The word Waqf is related to Muslim law. If any person wants to do ate it's property (movable or immovable) for a religious or charitable purpose, permanently in the name of God or Allah. Then the property is made as a waqf. The person who donates his or her property is known as WAQIF.But if a property is made as waqf, then there is no method by which the property can be taken back. So, once a waqf, always waqf. The transfer of ownership is permanent, and it goes to the State Waqf Board.  The state waqf board decides how to use that property for various purposes like making mosques, madrasas, graveyards, etc. To manage the property or waqf a caretaker or the manager is appointed, known as MUTAWWALI. The Mutawwali can neither sell nor transfer the property but he or she can generate the income from those properties. Out of the income generated,  7 percent goes to the state waqf boards. There are more than 30 waqf boards in Bharat, and the members are nominated by the respective state governments. While at the central level,  the Waqf councils are present . The disputes for any property are resolved by the Waqf tribunal.

An Overview of Waqf History in India

 

Waqf properties in India have been regulated by several laws to improve administration and prevent mismanagement:

 

The Mussalman Waqf Validating Act, 1913:

·     Allowed Muslims to create Waqfs for family benefit, eventually leading to charitable purposes.

·     Aimed to improve Waqf management but was not very effective.

·     The Mussalman Waqf Act, 1923

·      Introduced rules for proper accounting and transparency in Waqf management.

The Mussalman Waqf Validating Act, 1930:

 Strengthened the legal validity of family Waqfs, giving legal backing to the 1913 Act.

The Waqf Act, 1954:

·     Created State Waqf Boards (SWBs) for the first time to oversee Waqf properties.

·     Strengthened Waqf management after India’s independence.

·     Established the Central Waqf Council of India in 1964 to supervise State Waqf Boards and provided a pathway toward the centralisation of Waqfs.

·     This central body oversees the work under various state Waqf boards which were established under provisions of Section 9(1) of the Waqf Act, 1954.

Amendments to the Waqf Act, 1954 (1959, 1964, 1969, and 1984):

·     These amendments aimed to further improve the administration of waqf properties.

The Waqf Act, 1995:

·     This comprehensive Act repealed the 1954 Act and its amendments:

·     This was enacted to govern the administration of Waqf Properties in India.

·     It provides for the power and functions of the Waqf Council, the State Waqf Boards, and the Chief Executive Officer, and also the duties of mutawalli.

·     Created Waqf Tribunals, special courts with powers similar to civil courts.

·     Tribunal decisions are final and cannot be challenged in civil courts.

·     In 2005 , a committee was formed by UPA government under former justice Rajendra Sachar which is popularly known as SACHAR COMMITTEE . This committee was made regarding the social , cultural and educational condition of Muslim of Bharat . The Sachar committee submitted it’s report in 2006 on the status and potential of Waqf properties.  Some very shocking points were seen such as there are about 4.9 lakh registered Waqf in India having area of 6 lakh acres. It’s book value was shown about 6000 crore only but at that time it’s market value was about 1.2 lakh crores . The Waqf properties were mainly concentrated at West Bengal(148200 acres) and in Uttar Pradesh (122839 acres ) . On these properties ,only 168 crore income was generated annually with 0.27 percent return but sachar committee told that  at least 12000 crore income can be generated with 10 percent of annual return.  It showed a very huge corruption , under utilization and mismanagement of waqf properties.  Sachar committee suggested some Reforms which are as follow :

·     Stricter rules for mutawallis

·     Digital record keeping

·     Women representation must be allowed

·     Non Muslim professionals must be in the council and board so that the properties can be managed in the better way

·     Survey of the properties in every 6 months

The Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2013 introduced significant changes including:

·     Created three-member Waqf Tribunals, including a Muslim law expert.

·     Required two women members on each State Waqf Board.

·     Prohibited the sale or gifting of Waqf properties.

·     Increased the lease period of Waqf properties from 3 years to 30 years for better use.

·     On 8th August 2024 , the Union minister of minority affairs Shri Kiren Rijiju ji presented two bills in front of The Speaker of Lok Sabha which were named as

·     Waqf (amendment ) Bill , 2024

Mussalman Wakf (Repeal ) Bill , 2024

The bills were presented for better management and development of Waqf properties,  clear rules and smoother functioning of the Board . But due to  demand by opposition MPs the bills were sent to Joint parliamentary committee headed by Shri Jagdambika Pal ji . The JPC discussed with various public experts stakeholders,  and different organisation of Muslims . The committee submitted it’s report on 30th January 2025 . It had recommended 25 suggestions or improvement in the bills which were added at that time .

On 3rd April 2025 it was presented in front of Lok Sabha . It was passed by 288 – 232 majority . While in Rajya Sabha it was presented on 4th April 2025 , it was passed with majority of 128- 95 . On 6th April 2025 , the Bill was made an act after the final signature of Honorable President of India.

·     CONTROVERSIES RELATED TO THE PREVIOUS BILLS AND THE IMPROVEMENT DONE IN PRESENT BILL :

·     Before 6th April the non Muslims can also donate their properties as waqf but in new Bill those persons who are practicing Islam for at least 5 years only they can donate their land as waqf.

·     Waqf by user : One of the most controversial point of the previous acts . If a property is used for prayer , mosque or any other religious purpose of Muslims  for a long time , it will become automatically as waqf . Now , the official declaration will be required to claim any property as waqf .

·     The Government land enactment : About 5973 Government properties has been enacted by 25 state waqf boards . These properties have no any official document . Now , these properties will be verified by the District collector of that area . If official record exist that the land belongs to State waqf board then it will be given to them . If the documents of those properties are not present then the properties will be occupied by the Government.

·     Before 6th April,  the survey commissioner was appointed by waqf boards but expense were given by state governments.  The survey commissioner submitted it's report to State government and State Waqf Boards.  After this a gazette notification was issued by State government about that property , in the case of controversy the accused person has only 1 year of limitation period to challenge the property as himself . If one year was completed the property automatically became Waqf .

Limitation act of 1963 says that in case of individual property , time period to file a case is 12 years while in case of government property one can appeal with in 30 years .(exception was waqf )

Section 107 of Waqf act says that nothing contained in Limitation act 1963 shall apply to any suit for possession of immovable property comprised in any waqf or for the possession of any interest in such property.

Now , section 107 has been removed and the limitation period has became 12 years .

·     The property disputes were mainly solved by waqf tribunal . It’s decision was final and no one can go to high court or Supreme court against it . Only in the case of legal error or violation of Constitution one can appeal to Supreme court or high court. Now , if the person is not satisfied by tribunal then he or she can appeal in the highe court within 90 days .

·     Waqf Alal aulad (inheritance rights) : In a family of Muslim if there were no male heir (legal heir ) , the property was submitted to waqf automatically . The females were not considered as a legal heir in the family . Now , the females will also consider as a legal heir , equal rights and equal share will be given the them also.

·     In waqf Council: There are 22 members in which all of them were males and belonged to Muslim community . Now , 2 member will be non Muslim and 2 female members will also included in the council . The non Muslim members will be restricted solely to the administration of charity related matters only .

·     In Waqf board : There are 11 members in which all of them were males and belonged to Muslim community only . Now , 2 members will be non Muslim and 2 women will also be included in the Board members . Non Muslims will be restricted solely to the administration of charity related matters only .

·     In waqf tribunal: There were  a Muslim law expert , a State officer of Additional District Magistrate rank and a District/sessional / civil class 1 judge were present . Now , a current of former judge will be as chairman of the tribunal , a current or former joint secretary  of state government will be present in the tribunal  .

The waqf is definitely a part of Muslim personal law but state waqf boards and waqf council are a part of property dispute and the government can do a Change in it .

Team Yuva Aaveg-

Shashwat

🌟 Join Yuva Aaveg! 🌟
A vibrant community dedicated to empowering youth with the latest insights, discussions, and updates on topics that matter. Connect with like-minded individuals, share ideas, and stay inspired to make a difference.

📲 Join us on WhatsApp and Telegram for exclusive updates and engaging conversations!


WhatsApp


 Telegram

Thursday, April 3, 2025

"Oxygen Not Auction": Story of 400 acres


The 400 acres of contested land are at the heart of a two-decade-old battle over ownership. The Telangana high court's 2022 ruling that there was no deed of conveyance confirming the government's transfer of land to the institution appeared to put an end to the matter.


The initial 2,324 acres of land, including the 400 contested acres, were given to the university in 1975. The institution was the one who launched the lawsuit, asserting legal possession of the area. The institution contended that the government's maps were inaccurate. 


The court decided that the government still owned the land in the absence of such a deed. Furthermore, the government's case was strengthened when the university gave up some additional land to the government. Additionally, the Supreme Court last year upheld the 2022 ruling.


But the land's legal troubles didn't stop there. An environmental conservation NGO called Vata Foundation filed a public interest lawsuit in the high court, requesting that the land be designated as a "national park" under Section 35 of the Wildlife (Protection) Act and granting it "deemed forest" status. 


The Supreme Court's ruling in the Godavarman Thirumulpad v. Union of India case served as the foundation for its argument. Godavarman's dedication to environmental preservation earned him the nickname "Green Man." 


The petitioners claimed that the HCU campus was ecologically sensitive and possessed all the characteristics of biodiversity hotspots, as acknowledged by the Supreme Court in the Godavarman case, which led to the awarding of presumed forest status.


The Vata Foundation asked the government to postpone creating a master plan for the site, despite the fact that income records did not identify the contested acreage as forest land. 


However, in order to further its goal of economic growth through the establishment of an IT park in the region with foreign investments, the government has called for bids to create a master plan that satisfies "international standards."


According to reports, the government wanted to design a layout and put the plots up for sale to businesses. By the way, the property is located in Gachibowli's nearby financial sector.


After learning about the government's plans for an auction, university students started a social media campaign under the hashtag "oxygen not auction," claiming that the forest had a self-sustaining ecology and was home to protected wildlife species under Schedule I of the Wildlife Act. 


According to the state government, the proposed project is intended to support the government's aims for the creation of top-notch IT infrastructure, improved connectivity, and the availability of suitable metropolitan areas.


The university administration, however, released a statement disputing the government's assertion, stating that no survey was carried out by revenue authorities in July of last year to demarcate the 400 acres of property that the government had reclaimed from IMG Academies Bharata.


So far, just a preliminary examination of the land's topography has been done. Additionally, the institution refuted TGIIC's claim that it had approved the land demarcation. The statement claimed that no land demarcation had actually been completed and that the university had not been notified of it. 


The government had been asked to alienate the university's land.


According to the university's statement, "it will forward the representation of stakeholders to the government to reconsider the points raised and request that it conserve the environment and biodiversity in the area."


According to clause (ix) of statute 13, which consists of six nominees chosen by the President of India in their capacity as university visitors, the university also recommended that it be noted that any transfer of land allotted to it can only take place with the official approval of the executive council. 


The university's student union declared that it will keep up its legal and political resistance to the government's "land grabbing." 


Numerous police officers were stationed both within and outside the Hyderabad Central University (HCU) campus on Monday, March 31, in response to skirmishes between students and the police over the entry of bulldozers to clear a 400-acre area of forested land. 


The altercations occurred prior to the Congress government's alleged plan to put it up for auction to private information technology companies in order to establish an IT park. Both the students and the state's opposition Bharat Rashtra Samithi (BRS) have criticised the action. 


On Thursday (3rd April 2025), the Supreme Court halted the removal of trees from 400 acres of property in Kancha Gachibowli, which is close to Hyderabad Central University.


In an interim order, the state chief secretary was instructed by the supreme court to make sure that no tree cutting occurs until further directives. 


Team Yuva Aaveg-

Adarsh Tiwari

🌟 Join Yuva Aaveg! 🌟
A vibrant community dedicated to empowering youth with the latest insights, discussions, and updates on topics that matter. Connect with like-minded individuals, share ideas, and stay inspired to make a difference.

📲 Join us on WhatsApp and Telegram for exclusive updates and engaging conversations!


WhatsApp


 Telegram

Thursday, March 6, 2025

Oceanic Omens: What Do Deep-Sea Creatures and Mass Marine Gatherings Tell Us?

 

In recent times, unusual ocean events have sparked curiosity and concern. From the surfacing of the so-called “doomsday” oarfish and a lifeless anglerfish, to mass fish appearances in Kerala and a staggering 6.41 lakh olive ridley sea turtles washing up on Odisha’s shores, these events raise questions about our changing marine environment. Some scientists even suggest that fluctuating sea temperatures over recent years might be playing a part in these occurrences.

                                                   Image Source

Oarfish: The Deep-Sea Doomsday Fish

Oarfish (Regalecus glesne) are legendary for their enormous, ribbon-like bodies that can exceed 11 meters in length. These elusive deep-sea dwellers typically inhabit the dark depths, sometimes hundreds of meters below the surface. When an oarfish is found washed ashore or floating lifelessly at sea, it has often been seen as an ominous sign by coastal communities. However, marine experts believe that such events are more likely linked to natural causes—such as disease, injury, or environmental disturbances—than to any impending disaster.

Vulnerabilities:

  • Temperature Sensitivity: Being adapted to the stable conditions of deep water, oarfish may struggle when sudden changes in temperature occur, which can disrupt their metabolism and behavior.
  • Habitat Disturbance: Pollution and other environmental stressors can impact the deep-sea ecosystems where oarfish thrive.

Image Source- Insta


Anglerfish: The Luminous Lure from the Abyss

Anglerfish are another marvel of the deep, renowned for the bioluminescent lure that dangles from their heads. This specialized adaptation helps them attract prey in the pitch-black depths of the ocean. The rare occurrence of a dead anglerfish surfacing can signal that these creatures, too, are affected by changes in their environment.

Vulnerabilities:

  • Pressure and Temperature Changes: Adapted to high-pressure, low-temperature environments, anglerfish become highly vulnerable when exposed to the drastically different conditions at the surface.
  • Environmental Disruption: Shifts in water temperature—possibly due to climate change—can disturb their natural habitat, affecting their ability to hunt and reproduce.

Mass Fish Appearances in Kerala

Reports of large numbers of fish appearing along Kerala’s coastal waters have raised alarms and speculations. Although mass appearances can sometimes be a natural phenomenon, they may also indicate underlying environmental stress. Industrial discharge, pollution, or sudden changes in water temperature can disturb aquatic ecosystems, leading to unusual behavioral patterns among fish.

Vulnerabilities:

  • Pollution: Contaminants and industrial effluents reduce oxygen levels in the water, directly impacting fish health.
  • Temperature Fluctuations: As with many marine species, fish are sensitive to changes in water temperature, which can affect their distribution and survival.

Credit- Meta AI

Olive Ridley Sea Turtles: A Coastal Spectacle in Odisha

Odisha’s beaches have witnessed the gathering of an astounding approximate count of 6.41 lakh olive ridley sea turtles. While mass nesting events—known as arribadas—are natural for these turtles, environmental factors could be influencing these occurrences or their subsequent survival rates.

Vulnerabilities:

  • Temperature-Dependent Sex Determination: The sex of hatchlings is determined by the incubation temperature, meaning that fluctuating sea and beach temperatures can skew population ratios.
  • Bycatch and Pollution: These turtles face risks from fishing practices (such as entanglement in nets) and the ingestion of marine debris, both of which can lead to injury or death.
  • Habitat Loss: Coastal development and erosion can diminish nesting habitats, threatening future generations.

Environmental Concerns: The Role of Fluctuating Sea Temperatures

A common thread running through these events is the potential impact of changing sea temperatures. Scientists have noted that over recent years, variations in ocean temperature—driven by climate change and other environmental factors—can disturb deep-sea ecosystems. These fluctuations may contribute to:

  • Stress on Deep-Sea Life: Sudden temperature shifts can disorient or physically stress species like oarfish and anglerfish, making them more vulnerable to illness or environmental hazards.
  • Altered Migratory and Nesting Patterns: For species such as fish and sea turtles, even minor changes in temperature can have significant impacts on breeding, feeding, and migratory behaviors.
  • Increased Susceptibility to Pollution: Warmer waters can exacerbate the effects of pollution, further degrading the delicate balance of marine ecosystems.

Conclusion

While the sight of a dead oarfish or anglerfish might stir up superstitions about impending disasters, these events are more accurately seen as signals of environmental stress. The mass appearances of marine life—from Kerala’s fish to Odisha’s olive ridley turtles—highlight the pressing need for ongoing scientific research and proactive conservation measures. As sea temperatures continue to fluctuate, understanding and mitigating these impacts becomes essential to safeguarding our planet’s oceanic treasures.


This article is designed to spark thoughtful discussion about the link between environmental changes and marine life, encouraging further exploration and action towards preserving our oceans.



-Team Yuva Aayeg

Mayank

 

 🌟 Join Yuva Aaveg! 🌟

A vibrant community dedicated to empowering youth with the latest insights, discussions, and updates on topics that matter. Connect with like-minded individuals, share ideas, and stay inspired to make a difference.

📲 Join us on WhatsApp and Telegram for exclusive updates and engaging conversations!


WhatsApp


 Telegram

 

Thursday, February 27, 2025

The controversy of latent show

 


                                                                      Image Source

 What is the news ? About 2 weeks ago , one of the most popular show of you tube known as INDIA'S GOT  LATENT SHOW has been shut down and the members of these show were taken in the detention of police . Due to their arrest the whole society of bharat has been divided in two parts .

How the controversy started ?  The show which was popularly known as INDIA'S GOT LATENT  was inspired by the international Got Talent franchise and Kill Tony, featured a wide variety of acts, including singing, dancing, magic, comedy and others. This show was hosted by Balraj singh and a famous comedian Samay Raina . In this show many contenders participated and the winner will get prize money on the basis of total number of ticket sold in that show . Everybody was free to speak anything (abusive or non abusive words , vulgar comment on each other and also on parents etc. ) . Many talented persons also participated in this show . But in the 12th (last episode ) , which was chaired by Samay Raina,  Apoorva Makheeja, Asheesh Chanchlani, Ranveer Allahabadia and Balraj …. Many vulgar comments were passed by Ranveer as well as Apoorva which offended many peoples. They started opposing the vulgarity of this show and many FIRs were filed by many social media influencers. Due to huge pressure by opposition as well as party members, the Phadanvis government issued a notice to all the four judges to come and give clarification about the matter and present their opinions.  Last week Supreme court has also said that the comments passed by these you tubers will badly effect the society . Also the passports of these influencers has been taken by the government .

The division of society on this issue :

Indian society has been divided into two parts. Those who oppose this show say that the influencers are deviating the minds of minors and parents. Their statements can cause a huge decline in the mindset of young people. They are not following any code of conduct. That’s why this show must be suspended.

Another part of society are opposing the government. All the social media influencers including comedians and also of printing media are standing against the suspension of this show. They are saying that why should we take their statements as a serious note. We must see this show as an entertainment show not as a show which inspires anyone. The statements given by them are scripted and they do a lot of work on it , so we must respect their hardworking.

My opinion/Conclusion: Generally,  I don’t like to give opinions on these issues but according to me …. If the government is taking action on their statements I am with them . But a question should be asked to government that everything is in your hand then why should you not stop all these type of show for Indians.  Why are you targeting these influencers only? Why you didn’t ban on the pornographic content ? Why you have not stopped the Orchestra of Bihar which is totally based on vulgarity?

There are many questions to be asked from the peoples who are opposing it that they are very pious is their thoughts? Are they very sensitive so that vulgar comment of social media has badly disrupted their mind ? Does they watch the nudity on social media or not ? I believe that there will be silence in that zone .

And my question to those people also who are supporting the show members . Dear so called mature peoples if you child do such things (said by Ranveer ) will you support him or scold him ? I’d your child will openly abuse anyone or to you did you have courage to bear it? Will you reward him or punish?

Our society is trapped in many pros and cons but firstly we must have remove our impurities of mind then we have a right to comment anyone. We must have open to everyone but not in vulgarity but in sincerity , honesty and truthfulness.  We must have to deny these shows or talks which disturbs our society …….

-Team Yuva Aayeg

Shashwat

 

 🌟 Join Yuva Aaveg! 🌟

A vibrant community dedicated to empowering youth with the latest insights, discussions, and updates on topics that matter. Connect with like-minded individuals, share ideas, and stay inspired to make a difference.

📲 Join us on WhatsApp and Telegram for exclusive updates and engaging conversations!


WhatsApp


 Telegram

 

Thursday, February 13, 2025

Sailing into History: The Remarkable Navika Sagar Parikrama 2




Introduction:

        In an era where gender equality is gaining momentum across various fields, the Navika Sagar Parikrama 2 initiative stands as a beacon of women's empowerment and resilience. This remarkable expedition involves an all-women crew circumnavigating the globe, showcasing the strength, determination, and capabilities of women in the maritime domain. Building upon the success of the first Navika Sagar Parikrama, this second voyage aims to inspire and empower women worldwide.

 

Background:

     The Navika Sagar Parikrama initiative was first launched by the Indian Navy to promote maritime consciousness and encourage women to pursue careers in sailing. The inaugural expedition saw a team of six fearless women circumnavigate the globe on the INSV Tarini, covering over 21,600 nautical miles in 254 days. The success of this mission laid the foundation for Navika Sagar Parikrama 2, which aims to continue the legacy of breaking barriers and setting new benchmarks.

 

The Crew:

The heart and soul of Navika Sagar Parikrama 2 lie in its exceptional crew. Comprising two highly skilled and trained women officers from the Indian Navy, Lt Cdr Roopa A and Lt Cdr Dilna K, this team embodies courage, perseverance, and teamwork. Each member has undergone rigorous training and possesses a deep passion for sailing. Their journey is not just about navigating the seas but also about navigating through stereotypes and societal expectations.

 

The Journey:

   Navika Sagar Parikrama 2 involves a meticulously planned route that takes the crew across some of the most challenging waters on the planet. Starting from the Naval Ocean Sailing Node, INS Mandovi near Panaji, Goa, the voyage was flagged off on October 2, 2024. The journey covers the Atlantic, Pacific, and Indian Oceans, passing through the Cape of Good Hope and Cape Horn. The crew also achieved a significant milestone by crossing Point Nemo, the Oceanic Pole of Inaccessibility, on January 30, 2025.

Point Nemo, named after Jules Verne's fictional character Captain Nemo, is the farthest point from any landmass on Earth. Located in the South Pacific Ocean, it lies approximately 2,688 kilometers from the nearest landmasses: Ducie Island, Motu Nui (Easter Island), and Maher Island off the coast of Antarctica. This remote location is so isolated that the closest human presence is often aboard the International Space Station orbiting above. The waters around Point Nemo are known for their extreme remoteness and minimal marine life, making it a unique and challenging point to navigate. The journey is not without its challenges, including extreme weather conditions, navigation hurdles, and long stretches of solitude. However, each challenge presents an opportunity for the crew to demonstrate their resilience and skill.

 

Empowerment and Inspiration:

   One of the core objectives of Navika Sagar Parikrama 2 is to empower women and inspire future generations. By successfully completing this voyage, the crew sends a powerful message that women can achieve anything they set their minds to. Their journey serves as a source of inspiration for young girls and women, encouraging them to pursue their dreams, no matter how unconventional they may be.

 

Technological and Environmental Aspects:

   Navika Sagar Parikrama 2 is not just about human endurance; it also highlights the importance of technological advancements and environmental consciousness. The sailboat, INSV Tarini, is equipped with state-of-the-art navigation and communication systems, ensuring the safety and efficiency of the voyage. Additionally, the crew is committed to promoting sustainable practices, including minimizing plastic usage and studying marine ecosystems along their route.

 

Impact and Legacy:

    The impact of Navika Sagar Parikrama 2 extends far beyond the duration of the voyage. It challenges traditional gender roles and redefines what women can achieve in the maritime industry. The initiative's success will pave the way for more women to take up sailing and other unconventional careers, ultimately contributing to a more inclusive and diverse workforce.

 

Conclusion:

   "Sailing into History: The Remarkable Navika Sagar Parikrama 2" encapsulates a journey of courage, resilience, and empowerment. As the crew navigates through treacherous waters and defies societal norms, they leave an indelible mark on maritime history. This expedition is a testament to the boundless potential of women and a beacon of inspiration for future generations. The world watches in awe as these remarkable women sail into history.

 

 

-Team Yuva Aayeg

Praveen Kumar Maurya

 

 🌟 Join Yuva Aaveg! 🌟

A vibrant community dedicated to empowering youth with the latest insights, discussions, and updates on topics that matter. Connect with like-minded individuals, share ideas, and stay inspired to make a difference.

📲 Join us on WhatsApp and Telegram for exclusive updates and engaging conversations!


WhatsApp


 Telegram

 


The Pahalgam Attack: A Turning Point for the Indus Water Treaty?

    The Indus Water Treaty (IWT), signed in 1960, has long been a cornerstone of water-sharing diplomacy between India and Pakistan. Bro...